Research

Challenges faced by the Kenyan real estate ecosystem

This paper looks at the challenges the ecosystem faces in addressing illicit finance. Illicit finance continues to pose a significant threat to the integrity of Kenya’s real estate sector. Although Kenya has addressed gaps in its anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) laws and deficiencies identified in the 2022 Eastern and Southern Africa Anti-Money Laundering Group (ESAAMLG) Mutual Evaluation, the system still struggles in practice.

Kenya's Real Estate Ecosystem

Our report describes the key architecture current to 2025 that operates to prevent money laundering in the real estate sector in Kenya. It discusses the major players across five different categories of actors, the ways they work and the challenges they face. In doing so, it lays out the network that seeks to prevent and address money laundering into real estate in Kenya, as well as those actors seeking to introduce illicit finance into the sector or make it easier to do so.

Angola and the social reuse of assets

Citizen involvement through non-governmental and community-based organizations is a key feature in the recovery and reuse of recovered assets. The non-governmental organizations Associação Mãos Livres, Associação OMUNGA, Associação Pro Bono Angola and UYELE-Associação Cívica, dedicated to the defense of human rights and the exercise of citizenship, established the Working Group for Transparency and Truth in the Recovery and Reuse of Recovered Assets with the aim of supporting authorities in managing and ensuring the social reuse of returned assets.

From Sanctions Implementation to Enforcement

This report is intended as a snapshot of the legislative landscape surrounding breaches of international sanctions in these jurisdictions, the innovations that have been put in place, and the shortcomings that still need to be addressed. It presents a mixed picture in terms of frameworks and penalties applied: some countries considering breaches as administrative offences, others having the possibility to impose prison sentences. It also demonstrates discrepancies between sanctioning jurisdictions in how frozen assets and enforcement actions are publicly reported – making it harder for journalists, civil society and citizens to monitor sanctions implementation.